ADHD prevalence estimates across three decades: an updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Journal Article uri icon



  • BACKGROUND: Previous studies have identified significant variability in attention-deficit / hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) prevalence estimates worldwide, largely explained by methodological procedures. However, increasing rates of ADHD diagnosis and treatment throughout the past few decades have fuelled concerns about whether the true prevalence of the disorder has increased over time. METHODS: We updated the two most comprehensive systematic reviews on ADHD prevalence available in the literature. Meta-regression analyses were conducted to test the effect of year of study in the context of both methodological variables that determined variability in ADHD prevalence (diagnostic criteria, impairment criterion and source of information), and the geographical location of studies. RESULTS: We identified 154 original studies and included 135 in the multivariate analysis. Methodological procedures investigated were significantly associated with heterogeneity of studies. Geographical location and year of study were not associated with variability in ADHD prevalence estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Confirming previous findings, variability in ADHD prevalence estimates is mostly explained by methodological characteristics of the studies. In the past three decades, there has been no evidence to suggest an increase in the number of children in the community who meet criteria for ADHD when standardized diagnostic procedures are followed.

publication date

  • April 1, 2014

has restriction

  • bronze

Date in CU Experts

  • October 31, 2014 4:50 AM

Full Author List

  • Polanczyk GV; Willcutt EG; Salum GA; Kieling C; Rohde LA

author count

  • 5

Other Profiles

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1464-3685

Additional Document Info

start page

  • 434

end page

  • 442


  • 43


  • 2