journal article

• What Predicts Law Student Success? A Longitudinal Study Correlating Law Student Applicant Data and Law School Outcomes.  Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 205-265. 2016
• (In)competence in Appellate and District Court Brief Writing on Rule 12 and 56 Motions..  New York Law School Law Review. 841-862. 2013
• THE SECOND-CLASS CLASS ACTION: HOW COURTS THWART WAGE RIGHTS BY MISAPPLYING CLASS ACTION RULES..  The American University law review. 523-583. 2012
• THE OVERHYPED PATH FROM TINKER TO MORSE: HOW THE STUDENT SPEECH CASES SHOW THE LIMITS OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS-FOR THE LAW AND FOR THE LITIGANTS..  Florida law review. 1407-1457. 2011
• YES, LABOR MARKETS ARE FLAWED— BUT SO IS THE ECONOMIC CASE FOR MANDATING EMPLOYEE VOICE IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE..  Marquette law review. 959-981. 2011
• Reviving employee rights? recent and upcoming employment discrimination legislation: proceedings of the 2010 annual meeting of the Association of American Law Schools Section on Employment Discrimination Law..  Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal. 355-381. 2010
• How the New Economics Can Improve Employment Discrimination Law, and How Economics Can Survive the Demise of the Rational Actor"..  William and Mary Law Review. 183-259. 2009
• Reluctant Judicial Factfinding: When Minimalism and Judicial Modesty Go Too Far..  Seattle University Law Review. 549-567. 2009
• LITIGATION DISCOVERY CANNOT BE OPTIMAL BUT COULD BE BETTER: THE ECONOMICS OF IMPROVING DISCOVERY TIMING IN A DIGITAL AGE.  Duke Law Journal. 889-954. 2009
• THE COURTS UNDER PRESIDENT OBAMA.  Denver University law review. 727-742. 2009
• The intriguing federalist future of reproductive rights.  Boston University Law Review. 175-225. 2008
• Fighting discrimination while fighting litigation: A tale of two supreme courts.  Fordham Law Review. 981-1013. 2007
• Students and workers and prisoners - Oh, my! A cautionary note about excessive institutional tailoring of first amendment doctrine.  UCLA Law Review. 1635-1679. 2007
• Illuminating Secrecy: A New Economic Analysis of Confidential Settlements..  Michigan Law Review. 867-912. 2007
• Against “Academic Deference”: How Recent Developments in Employment Discrimination Law Undercut an Already Dubious Doctrine..  Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law. 1-22. 2006
• Where There's At-will, There Are Many Ways: Redressing the Increasing Incoherence of Employment at Will..  University of Pittsburgh Law Review. 295-364. 2005
• Women choosing diverse workplaces: a rational preference with disturbing implications for both occupational segregation and economic analysis of law..  Harvard Journal of Law and Gender. 1-88. 2004
• Fraud—reliance—fraud-on-the-market theory may not satisfy reliance requirement in claims of common law fraud or negligent misrepresentation—Kaufman v. I-Stat Corp., 754 A.2d 1188 (N.J. 2000).  Seton Hall law review. 308-312. 2000
• The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act: the scienter debacle..  Seton Hall law review. 1279-1321. 2000
• Public funding for disability accommodations: a rational solution to rational discrimination and the disabilities of the ADA /.  Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review. 197-236. 1998
• An appeal by any other name: Congress's empty victory over habeas rights—Felker v. Turpin, 116 S. Ct. 2333 (1996).  Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review. 249-263. 1997